Description - Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review by Christopher F. Zurn
In this book, Christopher F. Zurn shows why a normative theory of deliberative democratic constitutionalism yields the best understanding of the legitimacy of constitutional review. He further argues that this function should be institutionalized in a complex, multi-location structure including not only independent constitutional courts but also legislative and executive self-review that would enable interbranch constitutional dialogue and constitutional amendment through deliberative civic constitutional forums. Drawing on sustained critical analyses of diverse pluralist and deliberative democratic arguments concerning the legitimacy of judicial review, Zurn concludes that constitutional review is necessary to ensure the procedural requirements for legitimate democratic self-rule through deliberative cooperation. Claiming that pure normative theory is not sufficient to settle issues of institutional design, Zurn draws on empirical and comparative research to propose reformed institutions of constitutional review that encourage the development of fundamental law as an ongoing project of democratic deliberation and decision.
Buy Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review by Christopher F. Zurn from Australia's Online Independent Bookstore, Boomerang Books.
(228mm x 152mm x 25mm)
Cambridge University Press
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Country of Publication:
Other Editions - Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review by Christopher F. Zurn
Book Reviews - Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review by Christopher F. Zurn
Author Biography - Christopher F. Zurn
Christopher F. Zurn is associate professor of philosophy at the University of Kentucky. The recipient of a Humboldt Fellowship in 2004, he has published articles on deliberative democracy, judicial review, critical theory, feminism, moral theory, and aesthetics. An article on democracy and judicial review was chosen as one of the ten best philosophy articles published in 2002 by the editors of Philosopher's Annual, vol. XXV.