1300 36 33 32

Here a leading scholar in constitutional law, Mark Tushnet, challenges hallowed American traditions of judicial review and judicial supremacy, which allow U.S. judges to invalidate "unconstitutional" governmental actions. Many people, particularly liberals, have "warm and fuzzy" feelings about judicial review. They are nervous about what might happen to unprotected constitutional provisions in the chaotic worlds of practical politics and everyday life. By examining a wide range of situations involving constitutional rights, Tushnet vigorously encourages us all to take responsibility for protecting our liberties. Guarding them is not the preserve of judges, he maintains, but a commitment of the citizenry to define itself as "We the People of the United States." The Constitution belongs to us collectively, as we act in political dialogue with each other--whether in the street, in the voting booth, or in the legislature as representatives of others. Tushnet urges that we create a "populist" constitutional law in which judicial declarations deserve no special consideration. But he warns that in so doing we must pursue reasonable interpretations of the "thin Constitution"--the fundamental American principles embodied in the Declaration of Independence and the Preamble to the Constitution. A populist Constitution, he maintains, will be more effective than a document exclusively protected by the courts. Tushnet believes, for example, that the serious problems of the communist scare of the 1950s were aggravated when Senator Joseph McCarthy's opponents were lulled into inaction, believing that the judicial branch would step in and declare McCarthy's actions unconstitutional. Instead of fulfilling the expectations, the Court allowed McCarthy to continue his crusade until it was ended. Tushnet points out that in this context and in many others, errors occurred because of the existence of judicial review: neither the People nor their representatives felt empowered to enforce the Constitution because they mistakenly counted on the courts to do so. Tushnet's clarion call for a new kind of constitutional law will be essential reading for constitutional law experts, political scientists, and others interested in how and if the freedoms of the American Republic can survive into the twenty-first century.

Buy Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts book by Mark V. Tushnet from Australia's Online Bookstore, Boomerang Books.

Book Details

ISBN: 9780691070353
ISBN-10: 0691070350
Format: Paperback
(229mm x 152mm x 16mm)
Pages: 256
Imprint: Princeton University Press
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Publish Date: 24-Jul-2000
Country of Publication: United States

Other Editions

Reviews

» Have you read this book? We'd like to know what you think about it - write a review about Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts book by Mark V. Tushnet and you'll earn 50c in Boomerang Bucks loyalty dollars (you must be a member - it's free to sign up!)

Write Review


Books By Author Mark V. Tushnet

Free Speech Beyond Words by Mark V. Tushnet

Free Speech Beyond Words

Hardback, February 2016
$47.69
New Constitutional Order by Mark V. Tushnet

The New Constitutional Order

Paperback, August 2004
$61.20
Making Constitutional Law by Mark V. Tushnet

Making Constitutional Law

Hardback, March 1997
$114.26
Making Civil Rights Law by Mark V. Tushnet

Making Civil Rights Law

Paperback, February 1996
$76.46